Passenger chooses strip-down over pat-down.
When a San Diego man opted out of security screening using the Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT) at San Diego International Airport on Friday, he stripped down to his underwear in an attempt to avoid the pat-down procedures.
I like this guy. He took the ball and ran with it. Rather than being fingered by the stormtrooper TSA, this dude gave them his own visual inspection. If their only job is to make sure you aren't carrying weapons or explosives on the plane why is this a problem? Stripping down to your tighty-whities doesn't leave much to wonder does it?
Samuel Wolanyk took the protest started Nov. 13 by John Tyner to a whole new level.
Makes it kind of tempting to take it to the next level doesn't it? Full monty strip down.
Through a statement released by his attorney Sunday night, Wolanyk said "TSA needs to see that I'm not carrying any weapons, explosives, or other prohibited substances, I refuse to have images of my naked body viewed by perfect strangers, and having been felt up for the first time by TSA the week prior (I travel frequently) I was not willing to be molested again."
What more needs to be said? This guy just saved the TSA some work. How much can you really hide in a pair of butt huggers? What's next? Is the TSA going to start inserting digits into cornholes? GMAFB!
Wolanyk was arrested for refusing to complete the security process and for recording the incident on his iPhone, according to his attorney.
WTF? Now it's a crime to record TSA stormtroopers? Fuck the TSA, Fuck the diesel-dike Napolitano, and fuck Obama! Fuck 'em all. REVOLT! REVOLT! REVOLT!
Benjamin Franklin nailed it with this quote...
2 comments:
"Now we touch balls" LMAO!!
I found this interesting...
The terminology contained within the reported memo is indeed troubling. It labels any person who “interferes” with TSA airport security screening procedure protocol and operations by actively objecting to the established screening process, “including but not limited to the anticipated national opt-out day” as a “domestic extremist.” The label is then broadened to include “any person, group or alternative media source” that actively objects to, causes others to object to, supports and/or elicits support for anyone who engages in such travel disruptions at U.S. airports in response to the enhanced security procedures.
For individuals who engaged in such activity at screening points, it instructs TSA operations to obtain the identities of those individuals and other applicable information and submit the same electronically to the Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division, the Extremism and Radicalization branch of the Office of Intelligence & Analysis (IA) division of the Department of Homeland Security.
For “any person, group or >>>domestic alternative media source<<<emphasis mine]” that actively objects to, causes others to object to, supports and/or elicits support for anyone who engages in such travel “disruptions” at U.S. airports (as defined above) in response to the enhanced security procedures, the [applicable DHS administrative branch] is instructed to identify and collect information about the persons or entities, and submit such information in the manner outlined [within this directive].
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/30286
Fuckin' wild man. I guess that makes Representative Paul a domestic extremist. Check this out...
http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-crotch-groped-by-tsa-calls-for-boycott-of-airlines/
The only thing we have to fear is not being prepared...
Post a Comment